Director Peter Medak's movie illustrates the problems a married couple have coming to terms with their child's severe disability. At first, it seems that they deal with the situation by laughing about it. However, as the movie progresses, we see that the husband, Bri has given up hope for his daughter, and believes that her death would be a release, whereas his wife Sheila believes that she will one day recover. It also becomes apparent that Bri's humor is indeed his way of dealing with the trauma, but Sheila's laughter is an attempt to keep Bri happy and the marriage together. The characters of Bri and Sheila represent opposite sides of the moral argument on such cases: do we have the right to decide whether a human being should live or die, or is it cruel to artificially prolong a life that consists only of severe fits and constant pain?